• Adam Smith Institute

    Adam Smith Institute place holder
  • Philosophy & Logic

    Philosophy and Logic
  • Cambridge

  • Children’s SF

    Children's Science Fiction
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 422 other subscribers

David Davis is eloquently sound about the government’s sensible U-turn on minimum alcohol pricing


Reports tell us that the government has abandoned plans to set a minimum price on alcohol of 45p per unit.  The idea was that this would somehow stop problem drinking, but there was no evidence that it might.  It was always poorly targeted, and backed most enthusiastically by those who oppose drinking per se.  In fact alcohol consumption in Britain is relatively low, and has been declining over the last decade.  It is by no means clear that a minimum price was even possible, given our EU treaty commitments.  Some countries sell us cheap wine, and increasing its price might be ruled anti-competitive and not in accord with the single market rules.  Scotland has passed such a policy, but it seems to be in trouble with the courts even before it is implemented.  There is a problem of binge drinking in Britain, and of excess drinking in Scotland, but no evidence that setting a minimum price would curb it.  Amid the hand-wringing and hysteria of those now thwarted in their attempt to make alcohol more expensive, the words of David Davis MP on the proposed price rise and binge drinkers came like a cool breeze of common sense.

“It won’t just hit those, it’ll hit poor people. It’ll hit people in the north. It’ll hit the pensioner having their one bottle of wine a week; it’ll hit the hard-up couple doing the same. It’s going to cost…it’s going to transfer £1billion from the public to the people who sell alcohol, and it’s not going to work.

“If you look at pricing across Europe, in Germany they sell beer at a pound a pint cheaper than they sell here. They sell in Spain the same, in France the same, and they do not have this problem. There’s a drinking divide in Britain, a cultural divide, and you will not solve it by this rather heavy-handed sort of mass effect that won’t actually stop the problem.”

People who enjoy drinking in moderation will say “bravo!”


One Response

  1. And what are we to make of the mental abilities of a Prime Minister and other Ministers, who perceive a problem which is not supported by the data, which even if it did exist would not be solved by their chosen solution but which would adversely affect the lives of everyone and place a greater financial burden on them?

    The same is true of the climate change scam where the data does not support the claim, windmills where the data does not support their efficacy either to provide electricity or to solve the emissions non-problem but where the mental abilities of Prime Minister and other Ministers have chosen solutions which are blighting the lives of everybody at great cost.

    Then there is the economy…. ignored data and ineffectual remedies at great cost.

    Usually you just need two doctors and a police constable to remove those whose mental state are a danger to others to a place of safety.

    Why the delay?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: