• Adam Smith Institute

    Adam Smith Institute place holder
  • Philosophy & Logic

    Philosophy and Logic
  • Cambridge

  • Children’s SF

    Children's Science Fiction
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 422 other subscribers

A price freeze on energy is a sure way to guarantee a shortage

pylonsThe leader of the UK’s Labour Party, Ed Miliband, has promised a price freeze on energy if his party is elected.  This, he says, will help people by keeping down the cost of living.  He says it will save households £120 a year and businesses £1,800, costing the big energy companies £4.5bn.

In Miliworld the energy firms say something like “Oh dear. We’re making less profit now there’s a cap on prices. I guess we’ll just have to settle for less money.”  In the real world investors say something more like, “Ah, I see we’re not getting the returns by investing in energy firms.  OK, we’ll transfer our money to where we can obtain better returns on it.”  And the boards of energy companies say something like, “The price cap means we’ll have to cut back on the development of new sources because we no longer have the resources.  We’ll abandon that planned investment in exploration and development of new oil and gas fields.”  The result is less investment in energy.

In Miliworld people like the fact that energy prices are kept down.  In the real world cheap energy leads people to be less careful about economizing and to use more of it.  Demand rises even as supplies diminish, and the result is power shortages, rationing and blackouts.  In Miliworld when wholesale energy prices rise the big distributors shrug their shoulders and lose money.  In the real world they find themselves outbid for supplies by bidders elsewhere who can pass on some of that price rise to their customers.  Again, power shortages, rationing and blackouts.

This could be called the economics of the 1970s if it were any kind of economics at all, but it isn’t.  It is economic ignorance so profound that it isn’t even GCSE level.  One is left with one of two conclusions: that the people behind this policy are so depraved with power lust that they will happily accept future energy shortages as a price worth others paying if it gets them elected.  The other is that they are complete and utter morons.


4 Responses

  1. Of course they could be liars, have no such plans and merely want to energise their troglodytes. On the other hand, I think candlelight is so romantic; can I use it to power my laptop?

  2. I don’t know about Miliworld but I do know about Realworld. There are about 9 million pensioners in the UK and I am one of them. Dozens who I know personally are struggling with their energy bills and many will cut back substantially on heating this winter. This will be amplified by millions of families who will turn off the heating because they simply cannot afford to keep it on. This will cause a loss of income to the Energy Industry shareholders which could well overtake any freeze on prices which a Government could invoke. Capitalism and its profits are driven by supply and demand…….reduced demand, reduced profits.

  3. Building on B. Truman’s comment, someone should ask Milliband, in all seriousness, why does he hate the poor?

  4. It’s about setting the UK energy market up to fail. Milliband’s Big govt can hen step in and say, “See, the market has failed you. We will nationalise the energy system making it cheap and green”, and the people will cheer, bearing Milliband aloft.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: