• Adam Smith Institute

    Adam Smith Institute place holder
  • Philosophy & Logic

    Philosophy and Logic
  • Cambridge

    Cambridge
  • Children’s SF

    Children's Science Fiction
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 419 other followers

Unanticipated consequences of China’s one-child policy

china-childrenChina has jut relaxed somewhat its policy, introduced in 1979, to limit parents to just one child per family.  A generation of Chinese has grown up without brothers or sisters, although their parents typically belonged to families averaging four children.  Some fears were unfounded.  Sociologists spoke of a “Little Emperor” syndrome, with single children growing up pampered, spoiled and self-centred.  It has not happened according to several studies.  It seems to have been just Western sociologists projecting onto the Chinese something they had occasionally observed with an only child in the West.  There have, however been several interesting findings.

It should be noted that the parents of this generation had brothers and sisters, so the only child was surrounded by cousins to relate to and to interact with.  The Chinese actually use the word “siblings” to include cousins.  The second thing of note is that the parents of such offspring could spend on the one child the resources that might otherwise have covered four.  This has meant a higher degree of education for them, coupled with parental pressure to achieve.  The Australian group that used games and surveys to research singleton children in Beijing reported that this was a generation “significantly less trusting, less trustworthy, more risk averse and less competitive.”  They were also found to be “more pessimistic and less conscientious.”

More recent children have been born to parents who were themselves singletons, and thus lack the penumbra of extended families.  Furthermore, recent economic rends have led to increased migration, both within and beyond China, setting up distances between these only children and their grandparents and other relatives.  The question is whether this will weaken the typically Chinese concern with, and loyalty towards, family.  And one other factor is the economic one.  With only one child to care for, families have seen an increase in discretionary spending, and have seen living standards rise.  Combined with China’s economic expansion, this has seen unprecedented rises in well-being.  Of course, as this generation ages, there is concern that not enough young people will be around to pay the taxes that support social services.  But that lies further down the road…

Advertisements

One Response

  1. Interesting stuff ! There is another reason why China introduced the one child family, to control it’s population expansion. Taken to an almost illogical conclusion, if every male and a female produced only one child then a population could half in a generation or two. If this became an unlikely World policy, the human race could eventually disappear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: